FORDIMHYS
Project
Experimental program and set-up
In the first part, a model for the dissociation of a sediment
core partially saturated in methane hydrate was developed. Numerical simulation
allow to follow pressure and temperature inside the core; the evolution of
the border between hydrate zone and non hydrate zone is also given during
the resolution.
This second part deals with the problem of validation for this model ; indeed
the main objective is to compare numerical and experimental results in order
to verify the veracity of it. This validation can be done exclusively by this
mean.
Device
Like we need to compare experimental and numerical results, we must obtain
through this experiment the evolution of temperature and pressure during the
dissociation of a sediment core partially saturated in methane hydrate. The
list of main objectives can be resumed :
-display pressure and temperature gradients inside porous medium during dissociation.
-observe radial and longitudinal evolution of the dissociation boundary.
-follow quantity of dissociated gas during experiment.
In order to satisfy all these points it’s essential to have an experiment
that we can dismantled quickly in order to be able to freeze and extract sediment
(stop the dissociation and observe the hydrate evolution in the porous medium).
The place where we find sediment must be decomposed in several zones (lengths
are variable and oscillate between 20 cm and 1 m).
Fig. 1 : Schema of hydrate dissociation experiment.
The figure 1 gives a global idea of the experiment structure
: different sediment zones can be distinguished on this figure. All these
zones have an independent methane supply that we can control and regulate
with valves.
We use Inox tubes of ¼ ’’ for the main part of the experiment
and tube of 1’’ where the sediment is. Each section of sand (between
20 cm and 1 m) is cooled by a cryostat, independently of the others and can
be isolated with a pair of valves. The solenoid valve, closed or opened according
to reactor pressure, permit us to regulate the pressure during hydrate dissociation
(P constant) and we recover dissociated gas in the ballasts , in which we
control the temperature and we measure the pressure.
In connection with the cooling of the sediment figure 2 shows us system with a jacket around the 1’’ sediment tube in which an ethanol circulation takes place (ethanol is chosen in order to be able to cool until 250 K). At the end of each sediment zone a system was set up to prevent introduction of sand in the rest of the experiment and in particular inside valves ; on the figure 3 we can see the Teflon plug which supports the two different filters, the grain size of the sand is roughly equal to 250 µm : that’s why we have chosen a 120 µm (filter 1) and a 180 µm (filter 2) filters. By this mean we can be sure that sand will not entry inside valves and break them.

Fig. 2 : Thermo-regulation of sediment.

Fig. 3 : Sediment zone boundaries
The images 1, 2, 3 and 4 show the actual experiment where the sediment zone and the different probes can be identified.

Images 2, 3 : sediment zones and probes.
Image 4 : jacket and Teflon plug.
About the data acquisition a LABVIEW program has been developed to record temperatures and pressures and to control the opening and the closure of the solenoid valve ; with it any pressure or temperature gradient can be visualized and plotted in real-time.
Procedure
The main objective is to observe pressure and temperature gradients during
the methane hydrate dissociation inside sediment. The first step is the methane
hydrate formation with the Chuvilin’s method for the sand wetting. Then
we dissociate these methane hydrates by depressurizing the system and by regulating
the pressure with the solenoid valve (P constant ~2.5 MPa); temperature and
pressure at each boundary are controlled and recorded. Each section of sand
can be frozen and dismantled in order to observe the evolution of the dissociation
border.